A minor fall revealed 18 million annual exposures. Why counting injuries tells manufacturers less about risk than counting the chances to be hurt.
A senior executive was reviewing security footage of an employee climbing onto a shipping container to fit a strap. The strap was secured, the man stepped backward without looking, caught his foot on a raised section of grating, lost his handhold and fell five feet onto his back.
He landed on sand. Four feet away lay a concrete pad with a raised edge. He was treated for bruising and released the same day.
By the company’s own definition, any fall of four feet or more carries the potential for serious injury or fatality, this was a serious event. By the injury log, it was almost nothing. The difference between those two records was the sand.
Exposure is a state of vulnerability
Injury rates describe outcomes. Those outcomes are shaped by how well an organisation controls its hazards, and also by chance. An operation with 100,000 exposure events might record none, five or fifteen injuries, and the gap between those results is not always a gap in control.
Consider an employee standing beneath a colleague holding a hammer. Whether the hammer lands on the ground or on someone’s head does not change the exposure. It changes the paperwork.
This is why organisations serious about eliminating serious injuries and fatalities work on the pool of exposure rather than the incident count. Identify it, control it, reduce it, and the rate follows.
The question nobody asked first
When the leadership team reviewed the footage, the early suggestions were familiar: more safety observations, a stand-down, retraining. One person asked whether the employee should be dismissed for releasing the handhold, which breached procedure.
Then someone asked a different question. How often does anyone climb onto these units? Twice for every unit loaded. How many units are loaded each day across the network? Twenty-five thousand.
Fifty thousand exposures a day – roughly eighteen million a year.
Reframed that way, the organisation was not asking an employee to follow a procedure. It was asking its workforce to perform a preventive action correctly eighteen million times a year, in any weather, at any hour, at any level of fatigue and urgency. No workforce achieves that. Either the design carries most of the load, or luck does.
Our latest white paper – Autopsy of an Injury – works through the full case. It traces the raised grating back to a fleet-wide retrofit decision made years earlier, sets out the sequence of questions that moved the leadership discussion from individual blame to engineering and design, and describes how the team ended up examining whether its own discipline system was producing the culture it wanted.
Download the whitepaper by filling in the form below.
